The federal prosecutors overseeing the indictment of former President Donald J. Trump on prices of in search of to overturn the 2020 election requested a choose on Friday night time to impose a protecting order over the invention proof within the case, citing a threatening message that Mr. Trump had posted on social media.
By mentioning the incendiary put up in an in any other case routine request in search of to maintain Mr. Trump from making proof public, the prosecutors within the workplace of the particular counsel, Jack Smith, have been drawing the eye of the choose, Tanya S. Chutkan, to Mr. Trump’s longstanding behavior of attacking these concerned in prison instances in opposition to him.
Hours later, Mr. Trump’s marketing campaign responded with an announcement calling the put up “the definition of political speech.” The assertion urged that the put up had not been directed at anybody concerned within the election interference case, saying it was meant for Mr. Trump’s political adversaries.
The alternate of phrases started on Friday night when Mr. Trump posted a message on Reality Social, his social media platform, issuing a obscure however strongly worded menace.
“IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!” he wrote.
Shortly after, in a typical transfer early in a prison prosecution, the federal government filed its request for a protecting order within the case to Choose Chutkan. Prosecutors famous that protections over discovery have been “significantly necessary” on this occasion as a result of Mr. Trump “has beforehand issued public statements on social media concerning witnesses, judges, attorneys and others related to authorized issues pending in opposition to him.”
To show their level, they included a screenshot of the previous president’s threatening put up from that very same night.
A short while after the federal government’s submitting, Mr. Trump’s marketing campaign issued an announcement with no aide’s identify hooked up, insisting he was practising his First Modification rights.
“The Reality put up cited is the definition of political speech,” the assertion stated, including that it was in response to “dishonest particular curiosity teams” and political committees attacking him.
That Mr. Trump is a politician exercising free speech goes to be a component of his protection within the newest case in opposition to him. Mr. Trump’s marketing campaign on Friday additionally posted on X, the location previously often called Twitter, a 60-second advert describing the prosecutors who’ve thought of instances in opposition to him because the “fraud squad” performing on behalf of President Biden. (These embody the New York legal professional basic, Letitia James, who has introduced a civil motion case.)
The advert is one in all Mr. Trump’s most aggressive denigrations of the prosecutors, whom he has persistently denounced. He has additionally promised that if elected, he would appoint a “actual” particular prosecutor to research Mr. Biden and his household, proposing to remove the post-Watergate norm of Justice Division independence.
However the Reality Social put up was extra direct than his previous feedback, in a case the place a key facet of the indictment describes how Mr. Trump’s repeated and false public claims that he was a sufferer of widespread election fraud led to the violent assault by a pro-Trump mob on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
Judge Chutkan, who was randomly assigned the case when the indictment was filed, ordered Mr. Trump’s attorneys on Saturday to reply with any objections to the federal government’s request by 5 p.m. on Monday.
However that occasioned one more dispute between Mr. Trump’s authorized staff and prosecutors.
First, John F. Lauro, one in all Mr. Trump’s attorneys, filed court docket papers to Choose Chutkan, asking her to push again the deadline to object to the protecting order till Thursday. Mr. Smith’s staff shot again, telling Choose Chutkan that the federal government wanted the order in place to start out handing over discovery proof and accusing Mr. Lauro of in search of to delay the method.
“The federal government stands able to press ship on a discovery manufacturing,” Thomas P. Windom, one of many prosecutors, wrote. “The defendant is standing in the way in which.”
By the tip of the day, Choose Chutkan denied the request for a delay, leaving Mr. Lauro to satisfy the Monday deadline.
No matter what the choose decides to do in regards to the broader points regarding the protecting order, different judges in instances involving Mr. Trump have clearly warned him about utilizing threatening language.
At a court docket listening to in Manhattan in April, Justice Juan M. Merchan, who’s overseeing Mr. Trump’s state prosecution on prices stemming from a hush fee to a porn actress, warned the former president to chorus from making feedback that have been “more likely to incite violence or civil unrest.”
Justice Merchan’s admonition got here after Mr. Trump posted on Reality Social saying that “loss of life and destruction” may observe if he have been charged within the case in Manhattan.
That very same month, Choose Lewis A. Kaplan, who was presiding over a federal rape and defamation lawsuit filed by the author E. Jean Carroll in opposition to Mr. Trump, informed the previous president to cease posting messages in regards to the case. Those he had already written have been “completely inappropriate,” the choose stated.
Mr. Trump had derided the case on social media as a “rip-off” and personally mocked Ms. Carroll.
Mr. Trump has typically ignored such warnings and continued to put up threatening or spiteful messages with impunity.
After the listening to in entrance of Justice Merchan, Mr. Trump returned to Florida and to his customary follow, calling the district legal professional who introduced the New York prices in opposition to him, Alvin L. Bragg, a “prison,” and Justice Merchan “a Trump-hating judge with a Trump-hating wife and family.”
Days after Choose Kaplan’s admonition, Mr. Trump attacked him too, saying on a visit to one in all his golf programs in Eire that the choose was “extraordinarily hostile.”